No platform has won SEA
81.7%Builders use more than one AI platform, making multi-homing the default.
AI Builder Index2026 Report Preview2026 Report Preview
Evidence from 2,719 approved builders across 55 countries, drawn from Agentic AI Build Week 2026 registration data.
Top Takeaways
The full report carries the deeper segmentation. The public preview gives readers the core evidence: scale, technical depth, platform behavior, and why the builder community matters now.
Builders use more than one AI platform, making multi-homing the default.
Claude sits near OpenAI overall and strengthens among experienced builders.
Nearly three quarters of respondents are in their first two years of AI/ML.
The host-city effect is real, but the composition points to structural depth.
More than one in four builders use at least one Chinese AI model.
Referral counters attribute roughly a third of the community to connectors.
Dataset and Caveats
These findings describe AABW registrants: an engaged, self-selected builder community. They should be read as a view of the leading edge, not a representative estimate of the entire Southeast Asian AI workforce.
Chapter Lineup
The free preview establishes credibility. The locked chapters carry the deeper segmentation, implications, and decision guidance.
Geography, seniority, roles, and the concentration of AI talent.
Preview insightOpenAI, Claude, Gemini, Chinese models, cloud access, and tooling.
Preview insightHow early-career and senior builders adopt different stacks.
Included in the complete 2026 analysisRequest accessCountry-level differences across Vietnam, Singapore, India, and more.
Included in the complete 2026 analysisRequest accessWhat enterprises, policymakers, platforms, and investors should do next.
Included in the complete 2026 analysisRequest accessPriority actions for ecosystem builders and institutional partners.
Included in the complete 2026 analysisRequest accessPublic Preview Findings
Each figure is paired with one interpretation, matching the Stanford AI Index habit of making the chart do real evidentiary work.
Vietnam is the anchor, but the signal is wider than geography.
Source: AABW registration data, 2026 | Chart: GenAI Fund
Interpretation
Vietnam accounts for 64.4% of approved builders, partly reflecting the Ho Chi Minh City location. The U.S., Singapore, India, and Malaysia form the next tier, pointing to diaspora reach and regional participation.
The platform race is a portfolio race.
Source: AABW profile survey, 2026 | Multi-select field
Interpretation
OpenAI and Claude sit in near-parity, while Gemini remains a major third platform. Adoption sums beyond 100% by design because builders use multiple tools at once.
The leading project categories are enterprise-relevant.
Source: Keyword analysis of free-text project descriptions | Directional
Interpretation
Agentic systems, automation, conversational AI, and retrieval systems are not decorative experiments. They map to operational workflows that enterprises are actively trying to redesign.
Full Report Access
Unlock the full report for seniority curves, country spotlights, platform segmentation, trust-network analysis, market implications, and recommendations.
Premium Sections
Deeper segmentation shows how experience, country, role, and organisation type change the meaning of the aggregate platform race.
Source: AABW profile survey, 2026 | Structured tool-selection field
Source: AABW profile survey, 2026 | Selected major markets
Locked interpretation
Singapore shows high Claude adoption and strong Chinese model experimentation. Indonesia is small but striking: high seniority, high Gemini usage, and the highest Chinese model adoption among major SEA markets.
Map the work before deploying tools. Create role-specific training and AI-translator roles.
Treat AI talent as a workforce system, not only a technical training pipeline.
Invest in the evaluation layer and early-career cohorts before loyalties harden.
Final Signal